I have been using the new 5.0 watch for a week and my strain metrics make no sense compared to when I was using the 4.0. A handful of the days the strain is half of what I would have expected on 4.0, which is kind of crazy if you consider the logarithmic calculation. I’m not 100% sure which one is accurate (or if they both are very incorrect), but it definitely makes me question the integrity of the data. Have been able to identify trends when people switch from 4.0 to 5.0? Is what I am describing consistent with other users or was one of my devices faulty?
1 Like